סמינר במימון חשבונאות
Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment
Yishay Yafeh, The Hebrew University
Incentive Fees and Competition in Pension Funds: Evidence from a Regulatory Experiment
joint work with Assaf Hamdani (HUJI) Eugene Kandel (HUJI) and Yevgeny Mugerman (HUJI)
Concerned with excessive risk taking, regulators worldwide generally prohibit private pension
funds from charging performance-based fees. Instead, the premise underlying the regulation of
private pension schemes (and other retail-oriented funds) is that competition among fund
managers should provide them with the adequate incentives to make investment decisions that
would serve their clients’ long-term interests. Using a regulatory experiment from Israel, we
compare the effects of incentive fees and competition on the performance of three exogenously given
types of long-term savings schemes operated by the same management companies: (i)
funds with performance-based fees, facing no competition; (ii) funds with AUM-based fees,
facing low competitive pressure; and (iii) funds with AUM-based fees, operating in a highly
competitive environment. Our main result is that funds with performance-based fees exhibit
significantly higher risk-adjusted returns than other funds, but are not necessarily riskier (that
depends on the measure of risk used). By contrast, we find that competitive pressure leads to poor
performance, and conclude that incentives and competition are not perfect substitutes in the
retirement savings industry. Our analysis suggests that the pervasive regulatory restrictions on the
use of performance-based fees in pension fund management may be costly for savers in the long run.